Company Law : The FAQ clarifies that the Companies Act, 2013 does not restrict adjournment of a duly convened and commenced AGM. An adjourned AG...
Company Law : This FAQ examines the statutory authorities empowered to convene an Extraordinary General Meeting under the Companies Act, 2013. I...
Company Law : The 2025 amendment replaces annual DIR-3 KYC filings with a triennial compliance framework. Directors now need to file KYC once ev...
Company Law : The article explains when private companies can rely on MCA exemptions to borrow through board approval alone. It highlights the b...
Company Law : The article explains how Audit Committee, Board, and shareholder approvals apply to related party transactions under corporate law...
Company Law : The MCA has widened CSR eligibility by recognizing subscriptions to Zero Coupon Zero Principal Instruments as a valid CSR activity...
Company Law : The initiative addresses inefficiencies in the current filing system and proposes consolidation and automation. It highlights a sh...
Company Law : NFRA found major deficiencies in audit documentation and archival practices. The report highlights the need for stronger controls ...
Company Law : The inspection report highlights deficiencies in audit documentation, independence monitoring and compliance with auditing standar...
Company Law : The regulator found that the audit firm lacked an effective monitoring mechanism to ensure firmwide independence policies were pro...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Corporate Law : That the period of lockdown ordered by the Central Government and the State Governments including the period as may be extended ei...
Company Law : The MCA has amended the valuation rules to require Registered Valuer Organisations to maintain a minimum paid-up capital of ₹25 ...
Company Law : The Registrar of Companies penalized the company and its authorized signatory after an incorrect document was attached with Form A...
Company Law : MCA amends Schedule VII of the Companies Act to include subscription to zero coupon zero principal instruments on Social Stock Exc...
Company Law : MCA has amended the CSR Rules to recognize zero coupon zero principal instruments issued by Social Stock Exchange-listed NPOs. The...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai held that repeated return of official notices proved non-maintenance of a registered office under Section 12(1) of the ...
The ROC Bengaluru imposed penalties for a 94-day delay in conducting the required board meeting, citing violation of Section 173(1). The order directs payment within 90 days and outlines the appeal process
The adjudicating authority held that failure to include an email ID on the company letterhead violated Section 12(3)(c), imposing reduced penalties due to small-company status.
Authorities imposed penalties after finding continued failure to file financial statements for FY 2019-20. The order directs rectification, personal payment by officers, and outlines appeal and compliance requirements.
ROC held that company failed to file financial statements for FY 2021-22 and imposed penalties on entity and its directors. Order directs rectification and payment within 90 days.
The ROC penalised the company and directors for not filing financial statements for FY 2020-21. The order highlights statutory penalties, compliance directives, and timelines for rectification.
RoC Kolkata levied penalties for failure to file FY 2018-19 financial statements, holding the company and directors liable under Section 137(3) of the Companies Act.
ROC Kolkata levies penalties for failure to file financial statements under Section 137(3), directing rectification and payment within prescribed timelines.
ROC Kolkata levies penalties for prolonged non-filing of financial statements, directing rectification and payment within statutory timelines.
The ROC held that failure to reflect authorised capital alteration in every copy of the Memorandum violated Section 15(1), resulting in a penalty on the company and its directors. The ruling reinforces strict compliance with documentation updates.
ROC Ahmedabad imposes penalties for delayed appointment of independent directors, noting 81 days of non-compliance and directing payment under Section 172.
