Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Company Law : Explore penalties imposed on Mynd Fintech under Section 89 of Companies Act, 2013 by ROC, NCT of Delhi & Haryana. Understand impli...
Company Law : The Order No. 002/2024 Date: 05.01.2024, centered around CA Anil Chauhan, the Engagement Partner (EP) of Anil Chauhan & Associates...
Company Law : Section 155 of Companies Act, 2013, prohibits possession of multiple DINs by any individual director. In this article, we will ana...
SEBI : Uncover the legal complexities and SEBI regulations involved in the process of gifting shares by promoters of listed companies. Fr...
Company Law : IEPFA invites stakeholders to share insights on streamlining claims settlement process under the Companies Act, 2013. Deadline: Ap...
Company Law : ICSI requests amendments to Sections 204 & 149(6)(e)(ii)(A) of Companies Act,, to enable Company Secretaries in practice to be Ind...
Company Law : ICSI suggests Form DIR-6 modification, urging Corporate Affairs Ministry to allow Company Secretaries to update changes in their p...
Company Law : ICSI suggests an amendment in Section 77 of Companies Act, 2013. It aims to allow charge registration beyond 120 days with ad valo...
Company Law : ICSI urges MCA to mandate Form DIR-11 for KMPs, especially Company Secretaries, to enhance corporate governance & compliance durin...
Company Law : Explore the latest Companies Act amendments by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs in 2024. Learn about the new Central Processing C...
Company Law : Explore the significant MCA update! Discover the newly established CPC in Manesar, taking over e-form processing. Effective from 6...
Company Law : Understand the Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules 2024. Learn about eligibility, compliance, ...
Company Law : Ministry of Corporate Affairs penalizes Tricom India Limited for failing to file financial statements under Section 137 of the Com...
Company Law : Government of India imposes an INR 8.50 Lakh penalty on HOLITECH INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED for violating Companies Act 2013. Detailed ...
Authorized Representative of the company highlighted the company’s status as a private limited entity during the fiscal year 2015-16, arguing that the provisions concerning the constitution of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee were inapplicable.
The company and its directors have been penalized for not having a registered office for over 1000 days, violating the Companies Act. This case highlights the importance of companies maintaining a registered office.
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs has penalized Pacelife Marketing Private Limited for failing to file its financial statements for three financial years. This order highlights the importance of companies complying with financial filing requirements.
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs has imposed a penalty on Pacelife Marketing Private Limited for failing to file annual returns for three financial years. This order serves as a reminder to companies of their obligation to file annual returns and the consequences of non-compliance.
Government penalty for Somen Venture Private Limited for failing to update director addresses. Directors Kahkashan Zar & Mohammad Neyaz Ahmad fined ₹2.21 Lakhs each for violating Rule 12. Know your rights to appeal the order.
The company and its directors have been penalized for not filing Annual Return for two financial years. This order highlights the importance of companies complying with Annual Return filing requirements.
The company and its directors have been penalized for not filing financial statements for two financial years. This order highlights the importance of companies complying with financial filing requirements.
M/s. Octacle Integration Private Limited director failed to comply with Companies Act by not obtaining DIN. Adjudicating Officer imposed a penalty of ₹3,65,500.
Subhangi Industries Private Limited director appointed without a DIN (Director Identification Number) faces a penalty of ₹3.41 lakh. The company failed to comply with Section 152(3) of the Companies Act, 2013.
Explore the adjudication order by ROC Odisha on Utkal Chamber of Commerce for a typographical error in an advertisement, its implications under the Companies Act, and the conclusion reached.