Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Marelli Um Electronic Systems Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Marelli Um Electronic Systems Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Warranty Provision Is Allowable Business Expenditure: ITAT Deletes Disallowance Despite Large Opening Balance Delhi ITAT allowed the Assessee’s appeal and deleted the disallowance of ₹32.75 lakh made towards provision for warranty. The Tribunal held that warranty provision, when created on the basis of consistent accounting policy, past experience and historical trend, constitutes an ascertained liability deductible u/s 37, even if a substantial opening balance already exists. Relying heavily on the Supreme Court ruling in ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031