Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Agrico Organics Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Agrico Organics Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Reassessment Quashed for Non-Issuance of Timely Notice u/s 143(2) – ITAT Delhi The Delhi Bench of the ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2011-12 and quashed the reassessment proceedings on the ground that the mandatory notice under section 143(2) was not issued within the prescribed time. Although the assessee, in response to notice under section 148, requested that the original return be treated as filed in response, the Assessing Officer failed to issue a valid notice under section 143(2) within six months from the end of the financial yea...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930