Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Agrico Organics Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Agrico Organics Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)

Reassessment Quashed for Non-Issuance of Timely Notice u/s 143(2) – ITAT Delhi

The Delhi Bench of the ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2011-12 and quashed the reassessment proceedings on the ground that the mandatory notice under section 143(2) was not issued within the prescribed time. Although the assessee, in response to notice under section 148, requested that

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

840-Day Appeal Delay Not Condoned; Blaming CA Not Sufficient Cause: ITAT Bangalore Educational Society Cannot Be Treated as Religious Trust Without Evidence: ITAT Bangalore Sec 270A Penalty: Immunity U/s 270AA Cannot Be Denied Without Hearing – ITAT Bangalore ITAT Bangalore Deletes Sec 69A Addition on Demonetisation Cash Deposits Explained by Earlier Withdrawals Sec 68 Addition on Opening Loans Deleted; Interest & Salary Allowed – ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031