Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Singla Realters Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Singla Realters Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Unsecured loan additions u/s 68 deleted – Source of source not required for A.Y. 2014-15; expenses restricted to 20% disallowance – ITAT Delhi In Singla Realters Ltd vs ITO (A.Y. 2014-15), the AO made multiple additions including disallowance of construction material & travelling expenses and addition of ₹1.69 crore u/s 68 towards unsecured loans. The Tribunal held that since complete supporting details were not furnished for certain expenses, an ad-hoc disallowance of 20% of unsubstantiated building material and travelling expenses was reasona...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Wrong Mention of Section 69 Instead of 69A Does Not Invalidate Addition: ITAT Hyderabad Gift from Mother Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Investment: ITAT Hyderabad Temporary Cash Support for Student Visa Is Not a Loan Under Section 269SS: ITAT Chennai Section 69A Cannot Be Invoked for Cash Withdrawals from Own Bank Account Income Declared in Original Return Cannot Be Reduced in Section 148 Return: ITAT Hyderabad View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031