Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ramesh Kumar Gupta Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ramesh Kumar Gupta Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Jurisdiction Transfer Requires Section 127 Order -Directions u/s 120(5) cannot substitute a mandatory transfer order-  ITAT Delhi Quashes Assessment Assessee had filed return declaring income of Rs.52.49 lakh. Assessment was completed ex parte u/s 144. AO noted that case was initially selected for scrutiny by ITO, Ward 39(4), Delhi. Later it was transferred to ITO, Ward 36(4) & finally to ITO, Ward 36(6), Delhi, who passed the assessment order on 21.12.2019. AO recorded that such transfer was made by JCIT, Range 36 through order dated 23.10.2019 u/s...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930