Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Bhagwan Singh (ITAT Lucknow)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Bhagwan Singh (ITAT Lucknow) When Substantive Addition Stands Final, Protective Addition Cannot Survive- Jewellery & Cash Seized – Protective Additions in Employees’ Hands Quashed by ITAT The facts showed that the police had intercepted Shri Bhagwan Singh & Shri Sunil Garg at Banda with ₹10 lakh cash & 20.678 kg gold jewellery valued at ₹6.48 crore. Both stated that the cash & jewellery belonged to their employer, M/s Giriraj Ornaments (Prop. Shri Sachin Agarwal). These assets were later requisitioned u/s 132A. During assessment, both individuals reiterated tha...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031