Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Biharibhai Gokalbhai Patel (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Biharibhai Gokalbhai Patel (ITAT Ahmedabad) ITAT Deletes Section 69 Addition Because Registration Year Is Not Year of Investment; Revenue Appeal Rejected Because Documentary Evidence Explained Investments and Deposits; Section 69 Addition Cannot Survive When Actual Investment Belongs to Earlier Assessment Year; ITAT Upholds Deletion of Unexplained Investment Addition Due to Verified Bank Records. The Revenue appealed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] dated 28.11.2025 for Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2016-17, challenging the deletion of additions aggregati...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031