Case Law Details
Case Name : ACIT Vs Biharibhai Gokalbhai Patel (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Ahmedabad
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Biharibhai Gokalbhai Patel (ITAT Ahmedabad)
ITAT Deletes Section 69 Addition Because Registration Year Is Not Year of Investment; Revenue Appeal Rejected Because Documentary Evidence Explained Investments and Deposits; Section 69 Addition Cannot Survive When Actual Investment Belongs to Earlier Assessment Year; ITAT Upholds Deletion of Unexplained Investment Addition Due to Verified Bank Records.
The Revenue appealed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] dated 28.11.2025 for Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2016-17, challenging the deletion of additions aggregati...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

