Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Arun Kumar Pillai (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Arun Kumar Pillai (ITAT Bangalore) 153C Notice Invalid When Assessee Himself Is Searched — Bangalore ITAT Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Agnus Group Case The Bangalore ITAT (A Bench) dismissed the Revenue’s appeal for AY 2018-19 and upheld the NFAC–CIT(A)’s order quashing the assessment, holding that when the assessee’s own premises are covered under a search u/s 132, proceedings must be initiated u/s 153A and not u/s 153C. The Tribunal noted that the residence of Shri Arun Kumar Pillai, a key stakeholder of the Agnus Group, was also subjected to search, as evidenced by panchana...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031