Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sushil Kumari Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sushil Kumari Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) “I Find It a Fit Case” Isn’t Sanction: ITAT Delhi Quashes Reopening for Mechanical Approval u/s 151 Delhi ITAT “SMC” Bench, comprising Shri Satbeer Singh Godara (Judicial Member), allowed the appeal of Sushil Kumari for AY 2017-18 and quashed the reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 147, holding that the sanction granted u/s 151 was mechanical and invalid. The Tribunal noted that the approval dated 31.03.2021 by the prescribed authority merely recorded the phrase “I find it a fit case …”, without demonstrating any independent application of m...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

‘Make Available’ Test Not Met, No TDS on US Software Contractor Payments: ITAT Bangalore Section 54 Exemption Available for Every House Sold: Bengaluru ITAT Books Can’t Be Rejected Solely for Non-Audit; 8% Profit Estimate Quashed Apartment Owners’ Association Not Taxable at Maximum Marginal Rate: ITAT Bangalore ITAT Bangalore Allowed Section 80P Deduction on Interest from Scheduled & Co-op Banks View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031