Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs RMP Holdings Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs RMP Holdings Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) Wrong Sanction, Wrong Timing – ITAT Delhi Strikes Down Reopening- Notice Beyond 3 Years Needs Pr. CCIT Nod – Reopening Held Void Delhi ITAT has upheld the order of CIT(A), annulling the reassessment proceedings . for AY 2017-18. Tribunal held that the notice issued u/s 148 was invalid as it lacked the sanction of the correct “specified authority” prescribed u/s 151 & was also barred by limitation. Assessee, engaged in the business of finance & investment, had originally filed a NIL return of income for AY 2017-18. The assessment wa...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Technical Glitch in Form 26A Filing Cannot Trigger Section 40(a)(ia) Disallowance: ITAT Bangalore Form 26AS Alone Cannot Decide Taxability of FD Interest: ITAT Bangalore Entire Bogus Purchases Not Taxable If Sales Accepted; Only Profit Taxable: ITAT Bangalore Bangalore ITAT Reaffirms that Transfer Pricing Adjustment Must Be Restricted Only to International Transactions with AEs Reassessment Quashed as New Allegations Exceeded Section 148A Proceedings: Karnataka HC View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031