Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mangaldas Shetty Vs ITO (Karnataka High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Mangaldas Shetty Vs ITO (Karnataka High Court) Karnataka High Court Quashes Reassessment for Non-Disposal of Objections and Lack of Mandatory Notice The Karnataka High Court allowed the writ petition filed by Mangaldas Shetty, quashing the entire reassessment proceedings, including notices under Sections 148 and 143(2), the assessment order under Sections 143(3) read with 147, consequential demand, and penalty proceedings. The Court held that the reassessment was vitiated on multiple fundamental grounds. First, despite the assessee having filed detailed objections to the reasons recorded for r...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Quashes U/s 153C Assessments: AO Cannot Simply Copy Satisfaction Note Reopening Quashed: AO Added Share Capital, Loan & Premium Without Understanding Transaction Nature WhatsApp Chats, Screenshots & Suspicion Can’t Prove On-Money: ITAT Jaipur ITAT Directs TDS Refund Despite Delayed E-Verification; Revenue Cannot Retain Tax on Technical Grounds ITAT Quashes Reassessment: Approval from PCIT Instead of PCCIT Renders Section 148 Notice Invalid View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930