Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kansara Popatlal Tibhovandas Metal Pvt Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Kansara Popatlal Tibhovandas Metal Pvt Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) ITAT Ahmedabad Restores ₹4.78 Cr Addition Case – Assessee to Pay ₹10,000 Cost- Premature Order Violates Natural Justice – Tribunal Remands Case to CIT(A) Assessee, a private limited company engaged in manufacturing, filed its return declaring income of ₹35.21 lakh. During scrutiny, AO noticed sundry creditors of ₹10.52 crore. As assessee failed to furnish confirmations, PAN, ITRs & bank details for many creditors, AO treated ₹4.52 crore as unexplained cash credits u/s 68. Further, creditors of ₹24.47 lakh (...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Interest on Delayed Sales Tax, Service Tax & PF Payments Deductible; TDS Interest Disallowed: Patna ITAT Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031