Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : PCIT Vs Ind Sing Developers Pvt. Ltd. (Karnataka High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
PCIT Vs Ind Sing Developers Pvt. Ltd. (Karnataka High Court) Pre-search records not ‘incriminating’, No addition u/s 153A without incriminating material found during search: Karnataka High Court A search u/s 132 was conducted on 26.08.2008. AO passed order u/s 153A r.w.s. 143(3) treating sale proceeds as business income, relying primarily on a senior advocate’s opinion found during search. CIT(A) held it to be capital gains. ITAT ruled that assessment should be in hands of AOP, not the assessee. No valid incriminating material was found to support the addition in post-search reassessment...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930