Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kaishar Interiors Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-2011
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kaishar Interiors Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai Partly Allows Appeal: Reopening on Hawala Information Upheld, but Bogus Purchase Addition Remanded; Car Disallowance Deleted The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal partly allowed the appeal of Kaishar Interiors Pvt. Ltd. for AY 2010–11, dealing with challenges to reassessment proceedings and multiple additions made pursuant to information from the Maharashtra Sales Tax Department regarding alleged hawala purchase transactions. On jurisdiction and reopening, the Tribunal upheld the validity of reassessment unde...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Wrong Mention of Section 69 Instead of 69A Does Not Invalidate Addition: ITAT Hyderabad Gift from Mother Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Investment: ITAT Hyderabad Temporary Cash Support for Student Visa Is Not a Loan Under Section 269SS: ITAT Chennai Section 69A Cannot Be Invoked for Cash Withdrawals from Own Bank Account Income Declared in Original Return Cannot Be Reduced in Section 148 Return: ITAT Hyderabad View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031