Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jyotiben Niranjan Jani Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Jyotiben Niranjan Jani Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) Assessee, a senior citizen lady engaged only in share trading with no regular employees except a part-time accountant, filed ROI declaring ₹3,57,862. CPC processed the return u/s 143(1) & made an adjustment of ₹12,81,710 u/s 36(1)(va) based entirely on PF/ESI figures appearing in the originally uploaded Form 3CD, which mistakenly carried data belonging to another client of the CA due to a software error. Assessee filed rectification u/s 154, but CPC rejected it. Before CIT(A), Assessee produced a revised Form 3CD dated 13.07.2022 showing ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Wrong Section, Wrong Assessment: Bangalore ITAT Annuls Section 143(3) Order Passed After Search ITAT Quashes U/s 153C Assessments: AO Cannot Simply Copy Satisfaction Note Reopening Quashed: AO Added Share Capital, Loan & Premium Without Understanding Transaction Nature WhatsApp Chats, Screenshots & Suspicion Can’t Prove On-Money: ITAT Jaipur ITAT Directs TDS Refund Despite Delayed E-Verification; Revenue Cannot Retain Tax on Technical Grounds View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930