Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Brijesh M. Vs ITO (Kerala High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Brijesh M. Vs ITO (Kerala High Court) Section 281B- Attachment Lapses After Six Months Without Extension – Kerala HC Declares Provisional Attachment Void After Expiry-HC Orders Village Officers to Restore Property Rights of Assessee Petitioner, proprietor of M/s Geetham Sweets, challenged Ext.P2 order of provisional attachment dt  01.06.2017 passed u/s 281B attaching his immovable properties. He argued that u/s 281B(2), such an order automatically lapses after 6 months unless extended, but despite expiry, the authorities continued to restrict transactions on his property, preventing payment...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930