Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

ITAT Rejects Blanket Bogus Purchase Disallowance as Sales & Stock Records Were Accepted

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2026 taxguru.in 6192
Case Name
ITO Vs Dhawan Creative Prints Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number
Premium Access
Date of Judgement/Order
Premium Access
Related Assessment Year
2017-18
Subscribe to download.

Already Upgraded? Log in.

Advertisement

ITO Vs Dhawan Creative Prints Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)

Purchase Addition Restricted Because Only One Supplier Denied Transactions; ITAT Upholds Relief Because Non-Response to Section 133(6) Notices Alone Cannot Prove Bogus Purchases; Revenue Appeal Fails Because Purchases Were Supported by Audited Books and Stock Records; Section 69A Addition Deleted Because Cash Deposits Were Recorded in Audited Books; ITAT Rules Same Income Cannot Be Taxed Twice While Deleting Cash Deposit Addition.

The Revenue appealed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre dated 20.06.2025 for Assessment Year 2017-18. The assessee company was engaged in the business of trading fabric and cloth and had filed its return declaring total income of ₹8,04,920. The case was selected for scrutiny and assessed under Section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act.

During assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer examined the financial statements and noted revenue from operations of ₹41.15 crore and purchases of stock-in-trade amounting to ₹39.95 crore. Based on incomplete confirmations and an adverse response from one supplier, the Assessing Officer issued a show-cause notice proposing disallowance of 20% of total purchases amounting to ₹7,99,01,884. The assessee contended that the purchases were genuine and supported by books of account, ledger copies, bank statements, and stock records. It further argued that non-response to notices by third parties could not be attributed to it. However, the Assessing Officer was not satisfied and disallowed 20% of the total purchases. The Assessing Officer also made an addition of ₹8,30,083 under Section 69A in relation to cash deposits made during the demonetisation period.

Want to Read the Complete Judgment?

You have read the free case summary. Unlock the full judgment, the detailed judicial reasoning and the downloadable PDF, along with every other premium judgment on TaxGuru.

Read on with Premium
Goes straight to payment. GST invoice included.

One subscription covers the entire premium judgment library, not just this case.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: Graduate, CA in Job / Business, DD
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 23,558

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.