This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
ITAT Order Quashed as Fresh Evidence Was Accepted Without Following Rule 46A
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- PCIT Vs Kamraz Rural Bank (Jammu And Kashmir High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2006-07
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
PCIT Vs Kamraz Rural Bank (Jammu And Kashmir High Court)
The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court allowed a Revenue appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) relating to Assessment Year 2006-07. The appeal raised two substantial questions of law concerning the admission of additional evidence by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] under Rule 46A of the Income Tax Rules without granting the Assessing Officer (AO) an opportunity to examine or rebut the evidence and without recording reas...






