Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Manisha Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2022-23
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Manisha Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Section 68 Addition Quashed Due to Lack of Independent Enquiry;  Tribunal Quashes Addition Based on Untested Statement Alone;  Section 68 Addition Invalid Without Independent Verification: ITAT; GST-Reflected Sales Cannot Be Taxed Again u/s 68 Without Independent Enquiry ITAT Delhi Deletes ₹95 Lakh Addition: In this appeal, Assessee, a proprietor dealing in PVC pipes & fittings, challenged the addition of ₹95 lakhs made u/s 68. AO alleged that sales made to M/s Radha Buildtech India Pvt Ltd were bogus based on the search findings in the Gaur Sons group ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930