Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Govind Kumar Vs ACIT (Karnataka High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Govind Kumar Vs ACIT (Karnataka High Court) Partner’s Remuneration Cannot Be Taxed Ignoring s.28(v) r/w s.40(b); Karnataka HC Sets Aside Assessment for Non-Consideration of Statutory Provisions The Karnataka High Court, in Govind Kumar vs. ACIT, Central Circle-1(1) & Anr. (W.P. No. 10759 of 2025, order dated 01-Dec-2025), set aside the assessment order u/s 143(3), consequential demand notice u/s 156, and penalty notice u/s 274 r/w s.270A for AY 2023-24, holding that the Assessing Officer failed to properly consider the statutory scheme of s.28(v) r/w s.40(b) while taxing partner’s remu...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Quashes U/s 153C Assessments: AO Cannot Simply Copy Satisfaction Note Reopening Quashed: AO Added Share Capital, Loan & Premium Without Understanding Transaction Nature WhatsApp Chats, Screenshots & Suspicion Can’t Prove On-Money: ITAT Jaipur ITAT Directs TDS Refund Despite Delayed E-Verification; Revenue Cannot Retain Tax on Technical Grounds ITAT Quashes Reassessment: Approval from PCIT Instead of PCCIT Renders Section 148 Notice Invalid View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930