Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Prodyut Kumar Ghosh Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Prodyut Kumar Ghos Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)

ITAT noted that assessee in his R.O.I (return of income) erroneously reflected the sale consideration that he received to the tune of Rs.26,96,250/- as agricultural income. On being confronted by the AO and when asked by the AO to produce evidence of agricultural income, the assessee realized the mistake that Rs. 26,96,250/- was wrongly reflected as agricultural income in R.O.I where as it should have been shown as “Exempted Capital Gain “. However, the AO did not bother to examine the claim of assessee as to

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31