Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Section 56(2)(x) Addition Not Warranted on Guideline Value Alone: ITAT Chennai

Case Law Details

Case Name
Ramesh Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2022-23
Advertisement
Ramesh Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) Chennai ITAT: Registered Mortgage Adjustment Is Not Fresh Investment; Guideline Value Alone Cannot Trigger Section 56(2)(x) Addition The Chennai ITAT granted complete relief to the assessee by deleting additions made under sections 69A and 56(2)(x), holding that an earlier loan adjusted against the purchase price of a property cannot be treated as a fresh unexplained investment, and that stamp duty guideline value by itself is not conclusive evidence of the property’s fair market value. The Assessing Officer had treated ₹50 lakh as unexplained investment un...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,703

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *