This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 56(2)(x) Addition Not Warranted on Guideline Value Alone: ITAT Chennai
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Ramesh Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2022-23
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Chennai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Ramesh Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Chennai ITAT: Registered Mortgage Adjustment Is Not Fresh Investment; Guideline Value Alone Cannot Trigger Section 56(2)(x) Addition
The Chennai ITAT granted complete relief to the assessee by deleting additions made under sections 69A and 56(2)(x), holding that an earlier loan adjusted against the purchase price of a property cannot be treated as a fresh unexplained investment, and that stamp duty guideline value by itself is not conclusive evidence of the property’s fair market value.
The Assessing Officer had treated ₹50 lakh as unexplained investment un...




