Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : PCIT Vs Bellandur Chikkagurappa Jayaramareddy (Karnataka High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
PCIT Vs Bellandur Chikkagurappa Jayaramareddy (Karnataka High Court) Date of Agreement, Not Registration, Governs Capital Gain Valuation – Karnataka HC Upholds ITAT Relief Under Section 50C; Proviso to Section 50C Retrospective in Nature – MOU Date to Be Adopted for Stamp Value If Part Payment Made; High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal – Reaffirms ITAT View That “Text of Section 50C Is Clear as Gangetic Waters” Revenue appealed against the ITAT Bangalore order dated 05.01.2022 (in ITA No.1322/Bang/2019 for AY 2014-15) which had granted relief to Bellandur Chikkagurappa Jayaramareddy...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930