Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Suraj Narang Vs Assessing Officer (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Suraj Narang Vs Assessing Officer (ITAT Delhi) Assessee, Suraj Narang (HUF), engaged in yarn trading under the name “Love Kush Yarn”, filed return for AY 2018-19 declaring ₹7,11,350. Based on departmental information, AO reopened assessment u/s 147 on 29.03.2022 alleging that Assessee had made bogus purchases of ₹4,65,88,878 from five hawala entities—Shree Balaji Wooltex, Radha Kanheya Export, Sri Rameshwaram International, Soni Textiles & Shree Bankey Bihari Enterprises. Assessee did not file return in response to 148, nor comply with repeated 142(1) notices. AO rejected books u...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Bangalore ITAT Restores Section 50C & Section 54F Issues; CIT(A) Cannot Dismiss Appeal for Non-Prosecution Wrong Section, Wrong Assessment: Bangalore ITAT Annuls Section 143(3) Order Passed After Search ITAT Quashes U/s 153C Assessments: AO Cannot Simply Copy Satisfaction Note Reopening Quashed: AO Added Share Capital, Loan & Premium Without Understanding Transaction Nature WhatsApp Chats, Screenshots & Suspicion Can’t Prove On-Money: ITAT Jaipur View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930