Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Suraj Narang Vs Assessing Officer (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Suraj Narang Vs Assessing Officer (ITAT Delhi) Assessee, Suraj Narang (HUF), engaged in yarn trading under the name “Love Kush Yarn”, filed return for AY 2018-19 declaring ₹7,11,350. Based on departmental information, AO reopened assessment u/s 147 on 29.03.2022 alleging that Assessee had made bogus purchases of ₹4,65,88,878 from five hawala entities—Shree Balaji Wooltex, Radha Kanheya Export, Sri Rameshwaram International, Soni Textiles & Shree Bankey Bihari Enterprises. Assessee did not file return in response to 148, nor comply with repeated 142(1) notices. AO rejected books u...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031