Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Hemraj Umraoji Punekar Vs DCIT (ITAT Nagpur)
Related Assessment Year : 2009-2010
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Hemraj Umraoji Punekar Vs DCIT (ITAT Nagpur) Bogus Purchase Addition Based on Sales Tax Info Deleted – Non-Production of Vendors Lorry Receipts Not Fatal When Books Payments Verified – ITAT Nagpur The AO disallowed purchases of ₹35.48 lakh treating them as non-genuine based mainly on Sales Tax Department information and absence of lorry receipts/transportation documents. CIT(A) confirmed the addition. ITAT observed that assessee furnished tax invoices, VAT details, delivery particulars, ledger accounts & payments through banking channels, while sales and books of accounts were never ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031