Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Hemraj Umraoji Punekar Vs DCIT (ITAT Nagpur)
Related Assessment Year : 2009-2010
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Hemraj Umraoji Punekar Vs DCIT (ITAT Nagpur) Bogus Purchase Addition Based on Sales Tax Info Deleted – Non-Production of Vendors Lorry Receipts Not Fatal When Books Payments Verified – ITAT Nagpur The AO disallowed purchases of ₹35.48 lakh treating them as non-genuine based mainly on Sales Tax Department information and absence of lorry receipts/transportation documents. CIT(A) confirmed the addition. ITAT observed that assessee furnished tax invoices, VAT details, delivery particulars, ledger accounts & payments through banking channels, while sales and books of accounts were never ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Quashes U/s 153C Assessments: AO Cannot Simply Copy Satisfaction Note Reopening Quashed: AO Added Share Capital, Loan & Premium Without Understanding Transaction Nature WhatsApp Chats, Screenshots & Suspicion Can’t Prove On-Money: ITAT Jaipur ITAT Directs TDS Refund Despite Delayed E-Verification; Revenue Cannot Retain Tax on Technical Grounds ITAT Quashes Reassessment: Approval from PCIT Instead of PCCIT Renders Section 148 Notice Invalid View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930