This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Bad debts u/s. 36(1)(vii) are to be allowed once offered as income in any year
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- M. Sons Gems N Jewellery Pvt. Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2015-16
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
M. Sons Gems N Jewellery Pvt. Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
ITAT Delhi held that disallowance of bad debts claimed as deduction under section 36(1)(vii) is not justifiable if offered as income in any year. Accordingly, AO directed to verify that amount for which bad debts have claimed u/s 36(1)(vii) were indeed offered as income for the said years.
Facts- the assessee company has been engaged in the business of trading of gems and jewellery including its exports. During the year under consideration, the assessee had claimed an amount of Rs.5,75,38,704/- as bad debts under section 36(1)(vii) of the...





