This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
AMP Expenditure Allowed as No Reimbursement Was Proved: ITAT Delhi
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ACIT Vs Hariom Mobile Private Limited (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2019-20
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
ACIT Vs Hariom Mobile Private Limited (ITAT Delhi)
Price Drop Losses Allowed Because Distributor Bore Unreimbursed Margin Loss; ITAT Deletes AMP Disallowance Because Advertisement Expenses Were for Distributor’s Own Business; Section 37 Deduction Allowed Because AMP Expenses Were Not Reimbursed by Brand Owner; ITAT Upholds Deletion of Price Drop Disallowance Because Commercial Loss Was Genuine.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi, dismissed the Revenue’s appeals for Assessment Years 2019-20 and 2020-21 and upheld the orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (...




