Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Syed Abdul Khader Vs ITO (Karnataka High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Syed Abdul Khader Vs ITO (Karnataka High Court) Ex-Parte Reassessment- Non-Receipt of 148A Notices Justified by Address Change – Karnataka HC Restores Matter for Reconsideration The Petitioner challenged the ex-parte reassessment order dated 20.02.2025 passed u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 & the preceding order u/s 148A(d) & notice u/s 148, contending that all notices were sent to his old address & thus never received. Consequently, he could not file replies or participate in proceedings. It was submitted that the omission was bona fide & due to a change of address. The Petitioner sought...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930