This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
20% Pre-Deposit Not Mandatory as Stay Must Consider Genuine Hardship: Karnataka HC
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Instakart Services Private Limited Vs PCIT (Central) (Karnataka High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Karnataka High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Instakart Services Private Limited Vs PCIT (Central) (Karnataka High Court)
The Karnataka High Court considered a writ petition challenging orders rejecting the petitioner’s request for stay of tax demand for Assessment Year 2018-19 and seeking protection from recovery during the pendency of appeals. The petitioner contended that the authorities had incorrectly treated the requirement of depositing 20% of the disputed demand as a mandatory pre-condition for grant of stay by relying on the Circular dated 29.02.2016. The petitioner relied on an earlier decision of the High Cou...
Author Info
