Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Mere admission of Appeal by High Court sufficient to cancel penalty U/s. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2011 taxguru.in 342
Case Name
Nayan Builders & Developers Pvt Ltd Vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
1997- 98
Courts
ITAT Mumbai
Advertisement

Nayan Builders & Developers Pvt Ltd Vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai)

When the High Court admits substantial question of law on an addition, it becomes apparent that the addition is certainly debatable. In such circumstances penalty cannot be levied u!s 271(1)(c) as has been held in several cases including Rupam Mercantile Vs. DCIT [(2004) 91 ITD 237 (Ahd) (TM)] and Smt.Ramila Ratilal Shah Vs. ACIT [(1998) 60 TTJ (Ahd) 171].

_____________________________________

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
MUMBAI BENCHES “B”, MUMBAI

Before Shri R.S.Syal, AM and Smt.Asha Vijayaraghavan, JM

ITA No. 2379/Mum/2009 : Asst.Year 1997- 98

M/s.Nayan Builders & Developers Pvt.Ltd 36 Fancy Chambers, 94 Surat Street Mumbai – 400 009.

PAN : AAACN1198H.

Vs. The Income Tax Officer Ward 7(1)(1)

Mumbai.

(Respondent)
(Appellant)

Appellant by : Shri Sanjiv M.Shah
Respondent by : Shri Hari Govind Singh

O R D E R

Per R.S.Syal, AM :

This appeal by the assessee arises out of the order passed by the CIT(A) on 20.01.2009 confirming the penalty of Rs.37,32,777 imposed by the AO u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act in relation to assessment year 1997-98.

2. Shorn off unnecessary details it is an admitted position from both the sides that the penalty has been finally upheld qua the addition of Rs.1,04,76,050 towards income from Spectrum Corporate Services Ltd. assessed in this year, dis allowance of brokerage of Rs.10,79,221 and dis allowance of legal fees of Rs.2,00,000. It is seen that the Tribunal has upheld these additions in quantum proceedings for which the penalty has been held to be imposable. The learned A.R. has placed on record the judgement of the Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court in Income Tax Appeal No.23 68 of 2009 admitting inter alia the following two questions:-

“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was right in holding that the deposit Rs. 1,04,76,050/- received from Spectrum is exigible to tax in the Assessment Year 1997-98?

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.