This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Madras HC Upholds GST Demand as Seigniorage Fee Indicated Suppressed Turnover
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- KPR Enterprises Vs State Tax Officer (Madras High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Madras High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
KPR Enterprises Vs State Tax Officer (Madras High Court)
The Madras High Court dismissed three writ petitions filed by KPR Enterprises challenging orders dated 15.07.2024 for the tax periods 2018-2019, 2019-2020, and 2020-2021, while granting liberty to file statutory appeals before the appellate authority.
The impugned orders were preceded by Intimation Notices in Form GST DRC-01A dated 20.03.2024, to which the petitioner replied on 23.03.2024, followed by Show Cause Notices in Form GST DRC-01 dated 02.04.2024, to which replies were submitted on 25.06.2024. The final orders were passed in For...
Author Info
