Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Subscription Books Submit Post
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax INSIGHT Portal Data Insufficient for Reopening: Mumbai ITAT Quashes ₹47.33-Lakh Addition Income Tax Kolkata ITAT Restores ₹85.06 Lakh Addition, Holds Section 154(3) Notice Required Income Tax Kolkata ITAT Rejects 8% Profit Estimate Despite Books Rejection for Omitted Turnover Income Tax Prior Bank Withdrawals Explain Property Purchase Cash; Panaji ITAT Deletes ₹6.80 Lakh Addition Income Tax Section 148 Notice Upheld on ₹69.60 Lakh Property Sale; Ownership Verification Ordered Income Tax Panaji ITAT Deletes Penalties under Sections 271F & 271(1)(c) Due to Tax Consultant’s Failure Income Tax Panaji ITAT Rejects Section 115BBE, Treats Demonetisation Deposits as Poultry Receipts at 2% Profit Income Tax BSNL VRS-2019 Compensation Qualifies for Section 10(10B) Exemption: Panaji ITAT
Goods and Services Tax

Demand Remanded Due to Computational Errors in GST Assessment

By CA Sandeep Kanoi Goods and Services Tax Judiciary November 30, 2025
Share:

Case Law Details

Case Name
Hind Aluminium Company Vs State Tax Officer (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number
Only available for paid members
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Courts
All High Courts, Madras High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.

Already Upgraded? Log in.

Advertisement Hind Aluminium Company Vs State Tax Officer (Madras High Court) The petitioner challenged an order dated 19.02.2025 confirming demand under Defect No.3, relating to E-way bill verification compared with GSTR-1. The petitioner contended that there were computational errors in the figures used to confirm the demand and that the proposal to drop demand under Defect No.4 had not been considered. The petitioner had replied to the Show Cause Notice issued in Form DRC-01 on 19.08.2024 through a reply dated 01.10.2024, but was not given an opportunity to present the case in person. Al...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement
Filed under

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Name: CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 18,778
View full profile →
More from CA Sandeep Kanoi

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Related Articles in Goods and Services Tax
GST Seizure of Perishable Goods: Calcutta HC Allows Non-Owner to Seek Release U/s. 129(1)(b)

GST Seizure of Perishable Goods: Calcutta HC Allows Non-Owner to Seek Release U/s. 129(1)(b)

August 21, 2026
ITC Cannot Be Denied for Toll Plaza Gaps or Supplier’s Supplier Default: GSTAT

ITC Cannot Be Denied for Toll Plaza Gaps or Supplier’s Supplier Default: GSTAT

August 21, 2026
Interest Payable on Delayed GST Refunds; Fresh Certification Not Required: Telangana HC

Interest Payable on Delayed GST Refunds; Fresh Certification Not Required: Telangana HC

August 21, 2026
Retrospective GST Registration Cancellation Without Prior Notice Quashed: P&H HC

Retrospective GST Registration Cancellation Without Prior Notice Quashed: P&H HC

August 21, 2026
State Must Reimburse Differential GST on Works Contracts: Karnataka HC

State Must Reimburse Differential GST on Works Contracts: Karnataka HC

August 21, 2026
GST Bank Attachment Automatically Lapses After One Year: Delhi HC

GST Bank Attachment Automatically Lapses After One Year: Delhi HC

August 21, 2026
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *