Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Books Submit Post Subscription
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax Understanding Trust Law in India: Formation, Registration & Governance Corporate Law No Justification Can Ever Justify Denial of A High Court Bench to West UP Goods and Services Tax ITAT Deletes Bogus Purchase Addition Where Sales Are Accepted & GST Records Support Purchases Goods and Services Tax Patna HC Upholds Section 74 Proceedings Despite Voluntary GST Payment Income Tax ITAT Deletes Sections 41 & 43 BMA Penalties for Bona Fide ESOP Disclosure Omission Income Tax Madras HC Dismisses Writ Against Section 153A Assessment, Cites Alternate Appeal Remedy Income Tax ITAT Allows Section 10(10B) Exemption on BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme Compensation Income Tax ITAT Allows Full Exemption Under Sections 10(10B) & 10(10AA) for BSNL VRS Benefits
Custom Duty

CAAR Allows Withdrawal Because No Advance Ruling Was Pronounced

By CA Sandeep Kanoi Custom Duty Judiciary March 26, 2026
Share:

Case Law Details

Case Name
In re Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd (CAAR Delhi)
Appeal Number
Only available for paid members
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Courts
Advance Rulings, CAAR
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.

Already Upgraded? Log in.

Advertisement
In re Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd (CAAR Delhi) The Customs Authority for Advance Rulings (CAAR), New Delhi, considered an application filed under Section 28H of the Customs Act, 1962 seeking classification of “LFD Monitors” proposed to be imported into India. The application, dated 08.12.2025, was registered under Serial No. 153/2025-26. Subsequently, the applicant submitted a letter dated 17.03.2026 requesting withdrawal of the advance ruling application. The Authority examined the request in light of Regulation 20 of the Customs Authority for Advance Rulings Regulations, 2021, whi...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement
Filed under

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Name: CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 17,295
View full profile →
More from CA Sandeep Kanoi

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Related Articles in Custom Duty
CESTAT Sets Aside Confiscation of Exotic Birds for Lack of Smuggling Proof

CESTAT Sets Aside Confiscation of Exotic Birds for Lack of Smuggling Proof

July 25, 2026
CESTAT Quashes Confiscation of Gold for Curable Advance Authorisation Lapse

CESTAT Quashes Confiscation of Gold for Curable Advance Authorisation Lapse

July 25, 2026
Defective PSIC Alone Cannot Justify Confiscation of Imported Scrap: CESTAT Chandigarh

Defective PSIC Alone Cannot Justify Confiscation of Imported Scrap: CESTAT Chandigarh

July 25, 2026
Delhi HC Affirms Confiscation of Gold Brought Without Declaration

Delhi HC Affirms Confiscation of Gold Brought Without Declaration

July 24, 2026
SC Dismissed Revenue Appeal on Quicklime Classification Under CTH 2522

SC Dismissed Revenue Appeal on Quicklime Classification Under CTH 2522

July 24, 2026
CESTAT Allows Classification of Imported Quicklime Under CTH 2522 10 00

CESTAT Allows Classification of Imported Quicklime Under CTH 2522 10 00

July 24, 2026
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *