Deepa Satish Borse Vs Income Tax Officer (ITAT Pune) ITAT held that once it has come on record that the assessee’s matrimonial matter has already supported her case of having received the impugned sum by way of cash prior to demonetization for maintenance of herself and their sole girl child followed by similar arrangement post […]
In the case of the assessee, it is an admitted fact that minors and unregistered firms cannot become members of the society. Thus, assessee had paid interest to minor and unregistered firms who were not members of the assessee. This is violation of section 194A of the Act.
ITAT Pune held that as the assessee failed to establish why the shops were sold at loss to the partners and interest persons, principle of fraud squarely gets applicable. Accordingly, disallowance of loss duly justified.
CIT(E)’s order is also a non-speaking one to this extent we deem it appropriate to restore the assessee’s substantive grievance back to the very authority for appropriate adjudication as per law
Filing of Form No. 67 under Rules 128 of Income Tax Rules is a procedural requirement, therefore, is a directory in nature, non-compliance thereof does not disentitled assessee in claiming Foreign Tax Credit (FTC)
Exemption u/s 11 can be availed only if return of income was filed in the manner prescribed under section 139(4A) of Income Tax Act
ITAT Pune confirms disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for failure to deduct TDS on warehouse charges, emphasizing tax compliance in Vandana Dinehkumar Inani Vs ITO case.
Shrijit Arvindrao Pawar Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) rom mere reading of the assessment order, it would reveal that the Assessing Officer had not given reasonable opportunity to the appellant. The Assessing Officer issued notice u/s 143(2) on 18.11.2019, which was served on the appellant on 21.11.2019. The appellant also filed copy of the record of the […]
It is a well settled law that, reasons for formation of belief must have rational connection with or relevant bearing on formation of belief.
Swaraj Excellent Manpower Facilities Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune) Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that the Employee’s Contribution towards Provident Fund has to be deposited before the due date mentioned in the respective statute. In this case it is an admitted position by the assessee in the Audit Report that the amount was not […]
