Ravjibhai L. Kakadia Vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) The issue under consideration is whether the maturity value of the Keyman Insurance Policy is taxable under Income Tax Act and under which Head?
Orra Fine Jewellery Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) The substantial issue for consideration now before us for the A.Y. 2012-13 is whether the provisions of section 79 of the Act can be invoked and examined in the assessment year in which the assessee claimed for carry forward of losses or in the assessment year […]
ITO Vs Abhay Kantilal Shah (ITAT Mumbai) In instant case, as mentioned earlier, the assessee has filed before the AO copies of (i) bank statements for the financial year 201011, evidencing the payments made to these parties; (ii) ledger account of all the parties; (iii) purchase invoices from these parties and (iv) sale invoices as […]
ACIT Vs. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai) We notice that assessee has incurred consultancy charges to list the ‘ADR’ in ‘NYSE’ and later dropped this project. The AO treated the expenditure as capital and disallowed the same and simultaneously, invoked provision of section 40(a)(i) and 195 of the Act. We notice that in the […]
Sudhir Chandra Datt Vs ACIT (ITAT Jabalpur) It is an admitted fact that the Township project, work-in-progress (WIP) of which it claims as undervalued, is on the outskirts of Jabalpur, as opposed to the other two, located in the midst of the city. Land cost is a substantial part of a real estate project cost. […]
Schott Glass India Pvt. Ltd Vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai) We notice that assessee is in the business of manufacturing glass tubes and in the manufacturing, the melted glass has to pass thru feeder/nozzles in the furnaces. The temperature in which the melted glass is passed through feeder or nozzles at 1600 degree or more. It […]
Vodafone India Ltd. Vs PCIT (ITAT Mumbai) It was argued by the ld. AR that the learned Principal Commissioner of Income-tax [‘PCIT’] erred in assuming jurisdiction and initiating proceeding under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’) since the order passed by the Assessing Officer (‘AO’) was neither ‘erroneous’ nor ‘prejudicial’ to the interest […]
KEC International Ltd. Vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) In this case The undisputed position that emerges are that the advances have been given by the assessee to an entity in which it held 50% share. The assessee has entered into a Joint Venture (JV) agreement with an entity namely Edison Jehamo Power (PTY) Ltd. (EJP) on […]
Whether CIT(A) was justified in confirming the disallowance of foreign exchange fluctuation loss arising out of re-statement of External Commercial Borrowings (ECB) at the year end rates in accordance with AS-11?
Whether disallowing expenditure in the nature of discount under section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of tax u/s 194J by considering it as commission is justified in law?
