Madras High Court considers withdrawal of customs duty exemption for Apollo Hospitals’ imported medical equipment. Analysis of compliance with Notification No.64/88.
No ample opportunity was given to the legal heirs of the deceased assessee. Therefore, this Court is of the view that the order impugned in the writ petition is liable to be set aside and the matter should be remitted back to the original authority for affording due opportunity to the legal heirs of the original assessee to put forth their case.
Chennai Port Authority Vs DCIT (Madras High Court) The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner further submitted that the petitioner’s request for personal hearing through video conferencing was not considered and the same was mechanically rejected and the impugned orders were passed, which is clear violation of principles of natural justice. In similar circumstances, this […]
Madras High Court directed department to issue ‘C forms’ under the Central Sales Tax, 1956 for inter-state purchase of High Speed Diesel Oil.
Avigna Properties Pvt Ltd Vs State Tax Officer (Madras High Court) Deeming fiction of 70:30 formula attributable to construction service and land cost applies only when bifurcation is not provided Madras High Court held that methodology of deeming fiction set out under notification 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 (70:30 formula) attributable to construction services and […]
Madras High Court held that the object of Section 80 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (TNGST) is only to benefit an assessee who has been complaint in effecting payment of the admitted tax. Benefit of section 80 not available in case of amount due as per the liability self-assessed in any return.
SCN was issued on 27.03.2023 at 9.10.33 p.m. and petitioner was given 13 hours time to reply, which violates principles of natural justice
Sheetala Credit & Holdings Private Limited Vs ITO (Madras High Court) High Court held that assessing authority has rightly concluded that there is no capital gains that arises from the transaction since the entire transaction was a buyout of shares by virtue of order of the Apex Court. The officer, in this regard refers to the […]
Section 148A(b) Notice is not expected to be as detailed as assessment order and it would suffice that reassessment reasons broadly outlined
Petitioner is admittedly a non-filer and also accedes to the position that two PAN numbers were obtained, which has lead to present confusion.
