Madras High Court held that reopening of assessment u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act beyond the period of four years unjustified as all the particulars with regard to sale of agricultural land was disclosed before AO in full extent.
Explore the detailed analysis of Antony Alphonse Kevin Alphonse vs ITO case at Madras High Court. Uncover the assessment challenges, legal proceedings, and the court’s decision.
Madras High Court directs Customs authorities to review representation of Jineshwar Enterprise regarding seized imported goods. Know details of court order.
Madras High Court held that section 245C(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (as amended by the Finance Act, 2021) is read down by removing the retrospective last date of 1st date of February, 2021 as 31st day of March, 2021. All applications even in respect of cases arising between 01.02.2021 to 31.03.2021 shall be deemed to be pending application for purpose of consideration by Interim Board for settlement.
Madras High Court held that refund cannot be denied as refund application under section 54(1) of CGST Act was made within a period of limitation, however, supportive documents were submitted at the time of personal hearing. Notably, the time limit fixed u/s. 54 (1) is directory in nature and it is not mandatory.
Read the full text of the Madras High Court judgment in Precious Metals Refiners Pvt. Ltd. vs. Principal Commissioner of Customs. The case involves the detention of imported Gold Dore Bars misdeclared in the Country of Origin Certificate. The court directs release after 100% duty payment, resolving the dispute. Explore the legal analysis and the court’s directive for expedited adjudication.
Madras High Court’s judgment on Naveen Kumar’s case involving Customs Act violations. Learn about the typographical error issue and the court’s decision. Full text of the judgment provided.
Learn how the Madras High Court set aside an Assessment Order dated 09.03.2022 under Section 147 r/w Section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2013-14 for Shapoorji Pallonji Samalpatti Operator Services Pvt Ltd
Explore the Madras High Court’s judgment in the case of Vikas Sharma vs Additional Commissioner of Customs, addressing penalties on a Customs Officer for abetting gold smuggling. The court examines challenges related to the denial of mandated opportunities under Section 112(a)(i) of the Customs Act, emphasizing principles of natural justice. Read the full text for an in-depth analysis and the court’s directive on seeking statutory remedies.
GST Registration denial for Lessor and lessee running business in same premises: HC directs GST Dept to Grant GST Registration & directs petitioner-Company to demarcate the property
