It was submitted by appellant that as per the provisions of Section 20(2) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI Act) the record of the deceased petitioner, which has been illegally destroyed, appropriate penalty may be imposed upon the respondent.
The assessee gave additional discount to parties on account of godown rent paid by the said parties. According to the assessee, the customers did not take the delivery of the goods in their own godown after the purchase and the goods would continue to be at the godown of the assessee till the customer sells the goods to the other parties.
Yamuna Cables Accessories Pvt. Ltd. Vs Desai Enterprise (Gujarat High Court) Learned advocate Mr. S. P. Majmudar appeared for the petitioner and learned senior advocate Mr. B. S. Patel with learned advocate Mr. Umang Oza appeared for the respondents. 2. By way of the present petition, the petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court […]
The F.I.R. states the number of Santro car. Merely one of the witnesses has said that he has given the deposition by signing the document without reading and he was not much aware about which car has caused the accident, is not that much fatal.
State cannot claim preference over the subject property for the purpose of recovery of the dues towards tax. It is not in dispute that the first charge was created in favour of the bank and the bank in exercise of its powers under the SARFAESI Act, put the subject property to auction.
This criminal case is filed by the Official Liquidator under section 454 of the Companies Act, 1956 as the accused persons did not file statement of affairs within the stipulated time.
S K Industries Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) it is settled law that, the articles seized by the police, may be released to the person, who in the opinion of the Court, is lawfully entitled to claim, after preparing detailed panchnama of such articles as well as photographs of such articles and security […]
G.S.T. registration stands restored. If the Department wants to proceed against the writ-applicant in future on any grounds, it may do so in accordance with law after giving due opportunity of hearing to the writ-applicant.
MBR Flexibles Ltd Vs Deputy Commissioner of State Tax (Enforcement) (Gujarat High Court) It is clear from the record that Notice as well as order impugned was passed on the same date i.e. 06/01/2022. An opportunity of hearing has not been afforded to the petitioners and therefore, it is in breach of principles of natural justice. Considering […]
Adi Enterprises Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court) Applicants prayed to direct respondents to grant refund of amount of IGST already paid by the applicants on Ocean Freight pursuant to the Entry No.10 of Notification No.10/2017-IGST (Rate) dated 28.6.2017 with appropriate interest on such refund. On appeal HC held that respondents are hereby directed […]
