Company cannot decide disputed question of right & title, ownership or right of occupancy has no nexus with grant of electrical connection
Held that application u/s 11(6) for appointment of an arbitrator after the period of cause of action got extinguished is not maintainable
SC held that practice of engaging workman by separate but consecutive appointment orders of short duration with a view to opposing workman’s claim is not recognised by clause (bb) of Section 2(oo) of Industrial Disputes Act 1947
Held that the present application is allowed and bail is granted after taking into consideration the maximum punishment and provisions of compounding the offences and also that trial will take its own time to conclude
Magirsha Industries Vs Gujarat State Fertilizer And Chemicals Limited (Gujarat High Court) Issue relating to power of this Court to extend the mandate, insofar as the references made by MSME is seriously disputed by respondent counsel. Having regard to the fact that sub-section (3) of section 18 of MSME Act, 2006 that the provision of […]
State of Gujarat Vs Hasmukhbhai @ Harshadbhai Dahyabhai Makwana (Gujarat High Court) Present complaint is filed merely on suspicion and doubt. Suspicion, however strong, cannot take the place of proof, the Hon’ble Supreme Court has said, stressing that an accused is presumed to be innocent unless proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. No doubt the alleged offence […]
Held that the respondent i.e. Yes bank being a private Bank is not amenable to the writ jurisdiction of this Court.
Krishna Calibration Services Vs Jasmin Bharat Patel (Gujarat High Court) It is clear that the application purported to be under Section 89(2)(a) of ‘the Code’ came to be filed on 20.03.2014 jointly requesting the Court that there is element of settlement, which is acceptable to the parties, it may be sent to the Arbitrator selected […]
Sanganer Enviro Project Development Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) Learned advocate Mr. Sheth, appearing for respondent No.3 has submitted that in fact, the prayers made in the writ petition would not survive, since after the impugned order dated 26.11.2020, an arbitral award has been passed in the arbitration proceedings being Arbitration Award No.11 […]
Department should have adopted liberal approach in refusing request for time for filing objection to draft assessment order and finally passing assessment order. The department acted thick skinned.
