Har Kishan Vs President Secretariatt (Delhi High Court) On a query from the Petitioner, it is revealed that the Petitioner’s daughter had also applied for an appointment as Multi-Tasking Staff, in the Presidential Estate, Rashtrapati Bhawan. However, this fact does not find any mention in the present writ petition. A perusal of the writ petition […]
Paypal Payments Private Limited Vs Financial Intelligence Unit India (Delhi High Court) The Petitioner in the present petition challenges the impugned order dated 17th December, 2020, passed by the Director, Financial Intelligence Unit-India, Ministry of Finance, Government of India. By the impugned order, the Petitioner has been held to be a ‘reporting entity’ and a […]
Bliss Abode Pvt Ltd Vs Zonal Office Directorate of Enforcement & Ors (Delhi High Court) The Delhi High Court directed that n order to avoid a dispute in future and to ensure fairness and non-arbitrariness, the Registrar of the Adjudicating Authority under the PMLA shall ensure that in future, all orders passed by the Adjudicating […]
Delhi High Court grants extension to poppy seed importers affected by COVID-19. Importers get two months to complete imports. Impugned order quashed.
Present writ petition has been filed seeking a declaration that Sections 69 and 132 of the CGST Act, 2017 are arbitrary, unreasonable and being beyond the legislative competence of the Parliament are ultra vires the Constitution. Held by High COurt This Court has refused to pass any interim order holding that it is not inclined […]
RCI Industries And Technologies Ltd Vs Commissioner DGST Delhi & Ors. (Delhi High Court) If an officer of the Central GST initiates intelligence- based enforcement action against a taxpayer administratively assigned to State GST, the officers of the former would not transfer the said case to their counterparts in the latter department and they would […]
Delhi HC sets aside director disqualification in Anjali Bhargava vs Union of India case. Reactivation of DIN and DSC ordered for CFSS-2020 benefit.
Explore the Delhi High Court’s decision in Anant Narain vs. Union of India, addressing the revival of DIN/DSC for directors under CFSS-2020. Learn about the scheme’s purpose, conditions, and implications for disqualified directors of struck-off companies.
Power to attach the bank account must therefore be exercised only in strict compliance with the statutory power, and could not be extended to cover situations which were not expressly contemplated by the section. Absent the statutory precondition for exercise of the power of attachment, any order under Section 83 was wholly illegal and unsustainable.
It is well settled law that remand is not a power to be exercised in a routine manner and should be used sparingly, as an exception only when the facts warranted such course of action.
