Follow Us:

CESTAT Delhi

No Penalty on Importer for Error by Shipper/Exporter in Bill of Entry

April 6, 2022 1827 Views 0 comment Print

Callmate India Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi) CESTAT finds that there is no case of deliberate mis-declaration made out on the part of the Appellant importer. The Bill of Entry had been filed as per the packing list and Bill of Lading. Further, the Shipper/Exporter have accepted their mistake, there being error […]

CESTAT issues notice for Contempt of Court to CGST Commissioner

April 6, 2022 2769 Views 0 comment Print

Porteck India Info Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Goods & Service Tax & Central Excise (CESTAT Delhi) CESTAT finds that the action of the Asstt. Commissioner, of issuing of fresh show cause notice, instead of granting refund, in terms of Final Order of this Tribunal amounts to interference in the justice delivery system. […]

No Service Tax on Drilling of wells & Tubewells for farmers for agricultural use 

April 3, 2022 6216 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT held that the agriculture/cultivation includes irrigation or watering of the plants, as due to lack of irrigation, it is very difficult to have any agriculture produce. Accordingly, it was held that the activities carried out by the appellant is covered in the Negative List, which are exempt from Service tax.

CESTAT upheld penalty for not informing of counterfeit goods

April 3, 2022 717 Views 0 comment Print

D.J. Import (Prop-Harpreet Singh) Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi)  So far as penalty under Section 117 is concerned, CESTAT find that the conduct of the Appellant is also dubious, and not clean. In spite of having knowledge that the goods dispatched by the Shipper vide aforementioned Bill of Lading, being not as per order […]

CESTAT allows two day delay in filing appeal due to calculation error

April 3, 2022 810 Views 0 comment Print

Dow International Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi) The Appellant is in Appeal against impugned Order-in-Appeal whereby, the Commissioner (Appeals) have rejected the Appeal on the ground of limitation. It has been observed in the impugned order that although the Appellant had filed an application of condonation of delay but have not given […]

Assessee entitled to claim refund of service tax paid under RCM after 30.06.2017

March 31, 2022 2826 Views 0 comment Print

Indo Tooling Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner, Central Goods and Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi) CESTAT finds that payment of service tax including the cess relating to the period prior to 30.06.2017, paid in the year 2018 during the GST regime, amounts to payment in accordance with law as the same has been paid on the insistence […]

CESTAT allows Cenvat credit on maintenance & repair work of residential colony

March 28, 2022 885 Views 0 comment Print

Mangalam Cement Ltd. Vs Commissioner, Central Excise & CGST (CESTAT Delhi) Appeal is filed against denial of cenvat credit of service tax taken by the appellant on maintenance and repair work of their residential colony on the ground that the said service has no nexus with the manufacture of final product. Rule 2(l) of Cenvat […]

Customs Broker cannot use IEC of others without their knowledge for import by his client

March 28, 2022 3024 Views 0 comment Print

Falcon India (Customs Broker) Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi) Regulation 10 (n) of CBLR 2018 (read with erstwhile Regulation 11(n) of CBLR, 2013) requires the Customs Broker to verify correctness of Importer Exporter Code (IEC) number, Goods and Services Tax Identification Number (GSTIN),identity of his client and functioning of his client at the declared […]

Small mismatch in case of large variety of goods cannot be treated as deliberate

March 28, 2022 3288 Views 0 comment Print

Rubal International Vs Commissioner of Customs (ICD, TKD) (CESTAT Delhi) I find that only few goods were found to be mismatch with the invoice and packing list. I further find that the appellant had given cogent explanation based on the statement and clarification of the shipper, via E-mail, clarifying that due to a large variety […]

No unjust enrichment if Appellant borne the incidence of SAD & not passed the same to customers

March 27, 2022 1095 Views 0 comment Print

Marina Enterprises Vs Commissioner, Customs, Central Goods & Service Tax and Central Excise (CESTAT Delhi) Admittedly the appellant have sold the goods in India after importing and have paid sales tax on the said goods. Admittedly, they are registered with the Sales Tax Department having TIN number and have charged sales tax in their sales […]

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031