In re The Indian Hume Pipe Company Limited (GST AAR Andhra Pradesh) It is observed by the members of the authority for advance ruling that, audit was initiated by the jurisdictional authority under section 65 of the CGST act, 2017 and APGST act 2017,to verify all the issues regarding the business activities of the applicant […]
In re JCP Agro Process P Ltd. (GST AAR Gujarat) In case of purchase of tobacco leaves/bhukko from the agriculturist, the applicant is liable to pay GST on RCM basis at 5% [2.5% CGST and 2.5% SGST] in terms of[Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated 28-6-2017], Sr. No. 109 of Schedule I. Applicant is liable […]
AAR hold that impugned goods i.e. PVC floor mats for use in cars supplied by applicant is classifiable under CTH 8708 & applicable rate of GST would be 28% [14% each of CGST and SGST].
The applicant does not undertake any value addition on the goods. It earns a margin of 3% while trading imported goods. The assessable value for payment of customs duties has been determined by the applicant as the sum of price at which the goods are sold by Ingrasys Singapore to the applicant plus freight. It may be noted that such freight is directly met by ADSPL.
In re Wholesome Essentials (CAAR Delhi) CAAR consider that application has been submitted, seeking ruling on the questions that (i) Dried Black Currant (subject goods) is classifiable under HS code 08062010; and (ii) the subject goods are eligible to be covered under Sr. No. 32 of Notification 50/2017-Cus., dated 30.06.2017. I notice that the applicant […]
In re Pushkar RJ Singh – Raj Agro AIDS (GST AAR Punjab) a) The activity of building and fabricating of Tipper Body and mounting the same by the applicant and collecting fabrication charges including inputs required for such fabrication work, if the chassis is owned and supplied by the customer, will result in supply of […]
As per provisions of Section 16(2)(c) of CGST Act read with PGST Act, the purchaser is not entitled to claim Input Tax Credit on the purchases made by it from the seller who had discharged its tax liability but the preceding seller has not discharged its liability under the Act
In re Ingram Micro India Pvt. Ltd (CAAR Mumbai) The impugned goods are devices that connect two or more packet-switched networks or subnet works and deliver Wi-Fi network access to all parts of the house. They serve two primary functions: managing traffic between these networks by forwarding data packets to their intended IP addresses, and […]
In re HID India Private Limited (CAAR Mumbai) Thermal Printer Ribbon (TPR) cannot be classified under Chapter Heading 9612 as the Thermal Printer Ribbon is different from typewriter/computer printer ribbons because of the difference in the physical characteristics and printing process. CTH 9612 comprises of “Typewriter or similar ribbons, inked or otherwise prepared for giving […]
Input tax credit is not eligible on an inward supply which is held by the High Court as being neither a supply of goods or service.
