ITAT Mumbai set aside the ex parte dismissal of a Trust’s Section 271(1)(b) penalty appeal. Tribunal mandated a fresh hearing, citing pending Section 144 assessment and natural justice.
ITAT Mumbai set aside DRP directions for Celestial Vision Ltd, ruling the DRP mixed up facts, failed to address 44BB applicability, and mistakenly discussed Section 147 reopening procedures.
ITAT Mumbai set aside ex-parte assessment and appellate orders against the assessee for AY 2022-23. The matter is restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication, with the assessee directed to pay ₹25,000 to the PM Relief Fund.
The ITAT Ahmedabad has remanded a case involving the Narayan Cultural Mission, which was denied Section 80G approval due to alleged excessive religious expenditure.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Ahmedabad has dismissed a Revenue appeal, affirming that a real estate developer was correctly allowed to claim a project loss.
ITAT Kolkata allows Govinda Debnath’s appeal for statistical purposes. Tribunal condoned the 126-day delay after finding the assessee received no CIT(A) hearing notices, remanding the case for fresh, merits-based adjudication.
ITAT Kolkata remands Lakshmi Ojha’s AY 2020-21 appeal to the AO. The Rs.1.76 crore addition for property value difference must be re-adjudicated after obtaining a mandatory valuation report from the DVO in the interest of justice.
The Tribunal ruled that the addition, based on uncorroborated loose papers and rough jottings, was invalid. The decision followed a similar ruling in a co-partner’s case, establishing that such evidence without independent verification cannot be the sole basis for taxation.
The ITAT Delhi has set aside the reassessment of Avon Containers, ruling the Income Tax Department’s notice void.
The court found that the CIT(E) had failed to adequately examine whether the trust’s religious activities were within the 5% limit allowed under Section 80G(5B) and had also not provided the trust with a proper opportunity to be heard.
