Explore the Madras High Court judgment on CGST authorities’ audit powers under Section 65, clarifying conditions when audits can proceed despite State GST actions.
Income Tax Settlement Commission (ITSC) had authority to make additions to the declared income of taxpayers as ITSC’s role was not confined to regular assessments but extended to holistic evaluations of the disclosures and additional income brought to its notice through settlement proceedings.
Section 54 deduction was allowable on cash transactions involving residential property as it was ensured that genuine investments in residential properties were duly recognized for tax exemptions.
Read the detailed analysis of M. R. Constructions Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST) case from Madras High Court. Understand the implications of the VAT order set aside after 9 years.
Explore the Madras High Court’s ruling on Tvl. Moon Labels Vs Government of India regarding procedural errors in ITC transitioning and their impact on credit entitlement under GST laws.
Read about the Karnataka High Courts decision quashing an Income Tax demand order due to insufficient time provided for reply to a notice in Mohammed Saits case.
Read the detailed analysis of Kashi Ram Ved Prakash v. Commissioner of Commercial Tax U.P. by Allahabad High Court. The court discusses liability under UP Trade Tax Act and refund implications.
Read the Karnataka High Court judgment directing refund of Rs. 11,21,840 by tax authorities due to non-constitution of GSTAT. Detailed analysis and implications discussed.
Karnataka HC quashes criminal proceedings against Vidya Sachitanand Suvarna, citing jurisdiction issues in forged ITR case with fake CA seal.
When it’s established as a legal principle that an assessee isn’t obligated to request a ‘personal hearing,’ the Assessing Authority must still provide this opportunity before making an adverse order. Therefore, marking ‘No’ in the personal hearing choice holds no legal consequence.
