The Delhi High Court upholds the ITAT’s decision to delete a Rs. 5.17 crore addition to Anoop Jain’s income, finding no evidence he owned the funds under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act.
P&H High Court has ruled that a retired partner remains liable for a firm’s GST dues if they fail to provide timely intimation of their retirement to Commissioner.
Allahabad High Court dismisses petitions by U.P. Power Corporation Ltd., directing company to use statutory appellate tribunal to challenge CERC notifications on UI charges.
Delhi High Court recently ruled that GST departments can’t search an advocate’s office or seize documents without evidence of personal involvement in a client’s wrongdoing.
Punjab and Haryana High Court granted bail to the accused who is already in custody for a period of more than 6 months for commission of offence punishable under Section 132 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act [CGST Act]. Accordingly, bail granted.
Orissa High Court entertained writ invoking extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution since tax is being assessed twice on the same transaction and double taxation is prohibited. Accordingly, order set aside.
Calcutta High Court held that application u/s. 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 decided by Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction and not a Commercial Court inasmuch as the dispute between the parties is a commercial dispute is without jurisdiction.
Telangana High Court held that initiation of reassessment proceeding by issuance of notice without following faceless procedure is bad-in-law. Accordingly, notice issued u/s. 148A and section 148 of the Income Tax Act cannot be sustained.
Jharkhand High Court held that nature of allegations of disproportionate assets beyond known source of income, corruption and various illegal action against Hon’ble Member of Parliament cannot be said to be Public Interest Litigation. Accordingly, writ dismissed.
The Bombay High Court directs MahaRERA to restore hybrid hearings and create transparent processes, citing a Supreme Court precedent on access to justice.
