The court examined an eight-year delay in releasing a sanctioned tax refund. It ruled that such inaction is unacceptable and directed immediate payment with statutory interest.
The High Court held that an addition for unexplained investment cannot rest solely on an unsigned and unexecuted agreement. The key takeaway is that Section 69 requires concrete evidence of actual payment, not assumptions drawn from incomplete documents.
Telangana High Court held that the income derived from tissue culture operations by the assessee qualifies as agricultural income and hence exempted from tax under Section 10(1) of the Income Tax Act. Accordingly, the present writ stands allowed.
Calcutta High Court held that the mandate laid down under Section 19 of the PMLA has been complied with by the arresting officer in effecting arrest of the petitioner. Accordingly, arrest cannot be said to be vitiated for non-compliance of the same. Thus, writ petition is dismissed.
Himachal Pradesh High Court held that bail in scholarship scam case liable to be granted since there is no chance of commencement and conclusion of trial in near further and twin conditions as per section 45 of PMLA satisfied. Accordingly, bail application allowed.
The issue was whether employees can be taxed when employers deduct but do not deposit TDS. The Court held Section 205 absolutely bars such recovery, placing liability only on employers.
The issue was whether employees are protected when TDS is deducted but not remitted. The Court held tax remains payable as no credit arises without deposit.
The issue was a 44-day delay in filing Form 10B by a charitable trust. The Court held the delay was due to genuine hardship and directed acceptance of the form.
The issue was whether reassessment could proceed without disposing of objections to recorded reasons. The Court held that failure to decide objections vitiates the entire reassessment.
The Court examined rejection of condonation for delayed e-filing despite acceptance of related delays. It ruled that authorities must consider genuine hardship and cannot deny relief on a purely technical ground.
