Case Law Details
Deputy Commissioner (Works Contract) Vs NCLT (Kerala High Court)
Introduction: The recent judgment by the Kerala High Court in the case of Deputy Commissioner (Works Contract) versus NCLT has sparked significant debate and scrutiny. The court examined the legality of the National Company Law Tribunal’s (NCLT) decision to declare a tax assessment order as void ab initio under Section 33(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). This article delves into the intricacies of the case and offers a comprehensive analysis of the court’s ruling.
Detailed Analysis: The crux of the matter revolves around the powers vested in the NCLT and the scope of its authority under the IBC. The petitioner, Deputy Commissioner (Works Contract), challenged the NCLT’s jurisdiction to declare the assessment order void, arguing that it overstepped its bounds under the IBC.
The court meticulously examined the relevant provisions of the IBC, particularly Section 14, which mandates a moratorium on coercive legal actions against a corporate debtor upon commencement of the insolvency process. It emphasized the purpose of the moratorium in safeguarding the assets of the corporate debtor and facilitating the resolution process.
Furthermore, the court scrutinized Section 33(5) of the IBC, under which the impugned order was passed, and underscored its provisions regarding legal proceedings during the liquidation process. It emphasized that while a moratorium is imposed on recovery actions, there is no embargo on determining the quantum of tax and other levies against the corporate debtor.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Author Bio
