This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 95 Admission Upheld Despite Non-Production of Guarantee Deed: NCLAT Chennai
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Raiz Bashirudeen Vs Tata Capital Financial Services Limited (NCLAT Chennai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- NCLAT
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Raiz Bashirudeen Vs Tata Capital Financial Services Limited (NCLAT Chennai)
The NCLAT Chennai considered an appeal under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 challenging the order admitting proceedings under Section 95 of the Code against the appellant as a Personal Guarantor to the Corporate Debtor. The appellant principally contended that the admission order was vitiated because the deed of guarantee dated 30.05.2019 had not been placed on record and the proceedings had been initiated only on the basis of a letter of guarantee.
The Corporate Debtor had obta...






