Read all latest corporate law news, articles, notifications & circular on Taxguru.in. News on laws related to DIPP Labour Minimum Wages Gratuity PF Arbitration Negotiable instrument Essential Commodities SRFAESI Competition Act Corporate Law
Corporate Law : A detailed guide to LLP incorporation covering RUN-LLP, Form FILLIP, Form LLP-3, required documents, CRC approval and post-incorpo...
Corporate Law : Allahabad HC quashed demolition proceedings, adopted Supreme Court directions, and issued further directions governing demolition ...
Corporate Law : Allahabad HC examined criminal cases against advocates, Bar Council processes, verification issues, and issued compliance directio...
Corporate Law : Explains extra-judicial killings, constitutional and statutory provisions, Supreme Court guidelines and the legal framework govern...
Corporate Law : Explains the role, composition and functions of Safety Committees under Section 22 of the OSH Code, 2020 and the OSH Central Rules...
Corporate Law : CCPA begins action against 41 restaurants over default service charges, citing consumer complaints, 2022 Guidelines and the Consum...
Corporate Law : CBI filed its 16th chargesheet in a homebuyers fraud investigation alleging conspiracy, cheating and criminal breach of trust invo...
Corporate Law : DPIIT amends footwear QCOs by extending legacy stock clearance to 31 July 2027 and permitting annual import of 4,500 footwear samp...
Corporate Law : PIB issues a detailed FAQ on the Ethanol Blended Petrol Programme covering policy evolution, E20 rollout, vehicle compatibility, p...
Corporate Law : PIB outlines Indias E20 ethanol blending progress, programme milestones, industry views, and responses to frequently raised concer...
Corporate Law : DRAT declined to condone a 2417-day delay, holding the delay remained unexplained, and rejected the appeal against the DRT recover...
Corporate Law : CCPA held the 50,000-hour LED claim misleading for lacking product-level substantiation, ordered its discontinuation, and impose...
Corporate Law : CCPA imposed a ₹10 lakh penalty on TradeIndia for walkie-talkie listings lacking mandatory regulatory disclosures and directed f...
Corporate Law : CCPA imposed a ₹10 lakh penalty on Amazon over walkie-talkie listings lacking mandatory regulatory disclosures and directed comp...
Corporate Law : Kerala HC upheld rejection of education loans based on a parent's low credit score under the extant IBA Scheme but allowed fresh c...
Corporate Law : BCI directs State Bar Councils and law colleges to immediately implement its Circular on social media conduct, digital ethics and ...
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an Insolvency Professional's registration over CIRP compliance lapses, disclosure failures and Code violations in t...
Corporate Law : FSSAI amends the notified food laboratory list, updating accredited laboratories, registrations and scopes across multiple States ...
Corporate Law : PFRDA notifies Regulatory Sandbox Regulations, 2026 enabling controlled testing with limited relaxations while protecting subscrib...
Corporate Law : PFRDAs 2026 amendment allows Pension Funds to engage entities for specific purpose schemes under NPS, subject to Authority guideli...
The court set aside an adjudication order after finding that the confirmed demand far exceeded the amount proposed in the notice. The ruling reiterates that authorities cannot travel beyond the show cause notice while adjudicating.
The Court examined whether the stringent twin conditions for bail under the PMLA applied to a woman accused in a money laundering case. Holding that the statutory proviso applied, the Court granted bail, emphasizing delayed proceedings and completed investigation.
The appellate tribunal held that a date discrepancy in the possession notice was a harmless typographical error. It ruled that SARFAESI procedures were substantially complied with and restored the bank’s recovery action.
The tribunal dismissed the appeal, confirming that repeated failure to file written statements despite ample opportunity validates ex-parte recovery orders.
The appellate tribunal held that the bank had duly served, published, and affixed the sale notice as required under Rule 8(6). It ruled that the DRT erred in cancelling the auction despite full statutory compliance.
The appellate tribunal upheld the award of 9% interest on refund to an auction purchaser, holding that statutory violations by the bank’s authorised officer justified compensation despite a no-interest clause.
The appellate tribunal held that the magistrate had lawfully exercised powers under Section 14 after considering the statutory affidavit. The DRT’s restraint on recovery action was found to be contrary to law and was set aside.
The appellate tribunal held that the bank violated Rule 8(5) by conducting the auction nearly ten months after valuation without obtaining a fresh report. The sale and subsequent actions were set aside on this ground.
The tribunal held that objections to the maintainability of a bank’s Original Application claiming over Rs. 50 crores were rejected, affirming DRT jurisdiction over debts arising from fraudulent withdrawals.
The appellate tribunal upheld cancellation of the auction after finding that possession and sale notices were not properly served. It ruled that recovery actions without statutory compliance cannot be sustained.
